Scuba diving is driving a multi-billion-dollar industry, with over 50.7 million dives happening globally each year.
The latest research shows that upgrading all existing recreational dive sites to fully protected Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) could surge diving demand by 32% and generate an estimated $2.7 billion in additional annual revenue. The study was conducted by scientists from National Geographic Pristine Seas with help from PADI and its global marine conservation program, Adopt the Blue.
Divers Are Willing To Pay For Protected Sites
The study estimates that the median price of a dive is $58. However, findings show that divers would pay $112 for a dive inside a fully protected MPA, an additional
$53, and, with the increased demand, nearly doubling the
revenue to 3.81 billion.
Sixty-eight percent of dive sites are in an MPA, but only
15 percent are in highly or fully protected areas. Protecting
just 15 percent more dive sites could increase revenue to $865
million annually.
Fully Protected MPAs Will Boost Marine Life
The study also estimates that fully protecting
all unprotected dive sites could increase marine life
(biomass) by 113 percent on average.
If governments allocate only 1 percent of the
ocean areas used by divers to highly protected MPAs,
the global biodiversity could increase by 5 percent.
(Protecting the entire ocean, which is affected by global
warming and pollution, would boost the biodiversity by
39 percent.)
Which Locations Could Be the Next
Marine Protected Areas?
More than half of all recreational dives (52 percent)
happen in eight countries: Egypt, Thailand, the United
States, Indonesia, Australia, the Philippines, Mexico, and
Malaysia. If new MPAs were to be created, 61 percent
of the increased activity would be foreign tourists. The
most likely areas are East Asia, the Pacific, Europe, Latin
America, and the Caribbean.
The Hidden Problem Is Who Gets the Profits
While dive tourism may fuel economies in
developing countries, the financial benefits often slip
away from local communities because many diver
operations are foreign-owned. As a result, a significant
share of revenue never reaches local businesses or
workers since these operators frequently employ nonlocal
staff.
One solution could be for local governments
or park authorities to impose a fee to maintain and
protect the MPAs through a marine park entrance fee.
For example, Raja Ampat in Indonesia levies a US$43
entrance fee. Bonaire National Marine Park charges $40
for an annual license.
How To Protect the Oceans
Without Hurting Local Communities?
Designating a fully protected MRA means an outright
ban on fishing, which is often a vital economic lifeline
for many coastal communities. Without proper safeguards,
these protections could do more harm than good, cutting
off their earnings overnight. The challenge is not only
about protecting marine life or increasing income from
tourism but also about defending local livelihoods.
Can sustainable tourism fully replace fishing in
coastal communities? How can governments ensure
that income will reach local businesses, not just foreign
operators? What policies should be in place to balance
marine life protection and economic boom?
The future of the dive tourism industry, the health
of our oceans, and the economic stability of coastal
communities all depend on getting these answers right.
Adapted from the article in Forbes online entitled How Protected
Marine Areas Could Bring $2.7 Billion To Scuba Tourism,
by Emese Maczko.