Main Menu
Join Undercurrent on Facebook

The Private, Exclusive Guide for Serious Divers Since 1975 | |
For Divers since 1975
The Private, Exclusive Guide for Serious Divers Since 1975
"Best of the Web: scuba tips no other
source dares to publish" -- Forbes
X
May 2005 Vol. 31, No. 5   RSS Feed for Undercurrent Issues
What's this?

Who Gets Bent More?

from the May, 2005 issue of Undercurrent   Subscribe Now

During 1998 and 2002, Dan’s Project Dive Exploration tracked the incidence of decompression sickness (DCS) in four different recreational diving populations: live-aboards, shore/day boats, Cozumel dive guides, and Scapa Flow wreck divers (Britain’s Orkney Islands). Each group has certain inherent risks: Cozumel dive guides dive most frequently; shore/day boats attract more novice divers; live-aboards host gorilla divers who do multiple dives for seven to ten-day stretches; Scapa Flow wreck divers endure cold water and dive square profiles. Try hazarding a guess as to how these risk factors translate into actual bends rates for each different population; then compare your prediction to the actual rates shown in the table below.

For the study, 4,255 divers conducted 6,397 dive series (each series with between one and 88 dives) involving 41,294 air and 7,254 Nitrox dives. Out of these, there were 26 DCS cases (9 Type I, 17 Type II). The table below shows the DCS rate per 10,000 dives and the DCS rate per 100 divers.

DCS Rates for Live-aboard Divers, Shore/Day Boat Divers, Scapa Flow Divers, and Cozumel Guides
Number
of DCS
Cases
Number
of
Dives
Number
of
Divers
Dives
Per
Diver
No. of DCS
Cases Per
10,000 Dives
No. of DCS
Cases Per
100 Divers
Live-aboards
2
19,882
1,187
14.5
1.0
0.1
Shore & day boats
5
15,695
2,330
6.6
3.2
0.2
Scapa Flow
14
4,987
462
10.5
28.1
3.1
Cozumel Guides
5
5,050
42
87.8
8.6
9.8

 

As you can see from the table, live-aboard divers came out on the low end with one case of DCS per 10,000 dives (0.1%). Scapa Flow divers and Cozumel dive guides were on the high end in rates per 10,000 dives. While numerous variables affect the different dive groups studied, the results are interesting and should encourage more study as to the reasons for the wide variance.

I want to get all the stories! Tell me how I can become an Undercurrent Online Member and get online access to all the articles of Undercurrent as well as thousands of first hand reports on dive operations world-wide


Find in  

| Home | Online Members Area | My Account | Login | Join |
| Travel Index | Dive Resort & Liveaboard Reviews | Featured Reports | Recent Issues | Back Issues |
| Dive Gear Index | Health/Safety Index | Environment & Misc. Index | Seasonal Planner | Blogs | Free Articles | Book Picks | News |
| Special Offers | RSS | FAQ | About Us | Contact Us | Links |

Copyright © 1996-2024 Undercurrent (www.undercurrent.org)
3020 Bridgeway, Ste 102, Sausalito, Ca 94965
All rights reserved.

cd