Main Menu
Join Undercurrent on Facebook

The Private, Exclusive Guide for Serious Divers Since 1975 | |
For Divers since 1975
The Private, Exclusive Guide for Serious Divers Since 1975
Join Undercurrent on Facebook
"Best of the Web: scuba tips no other
source dares to publish" -- Forbes
April 2014    Download the Entire Issue (PDF) Vol. 29, No. 4   RSS Feed for Undercurrent Issues
What's this?

Gas-Integrated Computer Transmitters

why do we avoid them? and a few recommendations

from the April, 2014 issue of Undercurrent   Subscribe Now

Subscriber Content Preview
Only active subscribers can view the whole article here

Let's admit it. We divers are a funny lot. Although we are often seen as being very adventurous, we are usually very unadventurous when it comes to equipment innovation. This hard-to-understand state of affairs probably stems from newcomers being taught by instructors who have their credibility invested in long-established ideas. New ideas have to be adopted by these usually older divers and instructors, and that can take time to diffuse into normal practice. For example, why do so many sport divers dismiss gasintegrated computers out-of-hand? A bit of history is in order.

Back in the early '60s, divers used tanks with J-valves. When the air was depleted, the regulator became harder to breathe. The diver then pulled the J-valve release, which allowed access to the last quarter of the tank's supply; the regulator freed up and it was time to ascend. Then came submersible pressure gauges, which were met with similar resistance. Some divers saw them as an additional failure point, thinking they could easily explode with so much pressure inside them. A legacy of that is seen today when trainee divers are still taught to hold the gauge away when they first turn a tank on.

Then came resistance to horse-collar-style buoyancy compensators. Many believed it was too easy to inflate them and they would inadvertently send a diver hurtling to the surface. When conventional BCs replaced them, divers resisted them because they might float an unconscious diver face-down at the surface (unlike the horse-collar that worked more like a life jacket). Nobody asked why the diver would be unconscious. Presumably it was because he had lost control of his buoyancy and hurtled to the surface....


Subscribers: Read the full article here


Want to get more articles like these and
other important scuba updates sent monthly to your email?
And a FREE Recent Issue of Undercurrent

Free Undercurrent Issue
Get our free monthly Online Update, and a sample issue!

 

;

I want to get all the stories! Tell me how I can become an Undercurrent Online Member and get online access to all the articles of Undercurrent as well as thousands of first hand reports on dive operations world-wide



NEW! Find in  

| Home | Online Members Area | My Account |
| Travel Index | Dive Gear Index | Health/Safety Index | Environment & Misc. Index | Seasonal Planner | Forums | Blogs | Free Articles | Book Picks | News |
| Dive Resort & Liveaboard Reviews | Featured Reports | Recent Issues | Back Issues | Login | Join | Special Offers | RSS | FAQ | About Us | Contact Us | Links |


Copyright © 1996-2016 Undercurrent (www.undercurrent.org)
3020 Bridgeway, Ste 102, Sausalito, Ca 94965
All rights reserved.

cd