Undercurrent, the scuba diving magazine for serious divers reviews dive resorts and scuba diving equipment "Best of the Web ... scuba tips no other source dares to publish" — Forbes  
Authoritative   •   Independent   •   Nonprofit  
Public Area Online Members' Area
Home Travel Dive Gear Health & Safety Environment & Misc. Free Dive Articles Seasonal Planner Blogs Forums Books News
Reader Reports Recent Issues Back Issues Featured Reports Special Offers Search Join Login FAQ About Us Contact Links
May 2005 Vol. 20, No. 5     RSS Feed for Undercurrent Issues
What's this?

Should We Dive with Overfilled Tanks?

from the May, 2005 issue of Undercurrent   Subscribe Now

Jeremy Anschel of Cozumel’s Living Underwater overfills his steel tanks knowing that the practice will shorten their life span. He’s willing to replace his tanks more frequently to provide his customers more air, and thus more bottom time. What he hasn’t factored in, however, is the danger that a consistently overfilled tank could blow up before it ever fails a 5-year hydrostatic test.

Undercurrent discussed overfilling tanks with Bill High, President of Professional Scuba Inspectors, Inc. (PSI) and the dive industry’s leading expert on tanks. He told us unequivocally that continuous over-pressurizing of either aluminum or steel scuba tanks has a “cumulative effect, so the danger of an explosive rupture increases over time.” High adds: “The practice of overfilling cylinders is illegal in the U.S.” About half of all scuba tank ruptures studied by PSI have occurred in steel cylinders.

Although 90 percent of explosive ruptures studied by High have occurred while the tanks were being filled, in the past year two filled cylinders exploded while being stored, one seven months after being filled. High says that several people have been injured or killed by explosive cylinder ruptures, although — so far — no explosions have occurred while a tank was on a diver’s back.

High also notes that hydrostatic exams don’t test the integrity of the crown or bottom of a cylinder, and he knows of at least two cases where the bottoms blew out of steel tanks.

Contrary to Anschel’s claim that the rust around the boots on some of his tanks merely affected the galvanized coating, High says that exterior rust is definitely a red flag. “The walls of a 2400-psi steel cylinder are only 190/1000s of an inch thick,” he points out, “so a pit that’s no deeper than 1/16 of an inch is cause for a tank to be condemned.” If you’re going to dive with any operation, don’t accept a rusty cylinder.

The rusted LU tanks our correspondent spotted were “inherited” from the previous owner, according to Anschel, and due to be replaced soon. One simple solution would be to replace them with higher-rated tanks. For instance, PST-Scuba (www.pstscuba.com) is offering steel tanks with service pressures as high as 3442 psi in sizes from 65 to 130 cu. ft.

I want to get all the stories! Tell me how I can become an Undercurrent Online Member and get online access to all the articles of Undercurrent as well as thousands of first hand reports on dive operations world-wide



Find in
Advanced Search

Sign up to receive our free
Undercurrent Online Update email
with news for serious divers
            Unsubscribe
We will not sell, exchange, or give your email address to any third party
.

| Home | Online Members Area | Print Subscribers Area |
My Account
| Travel Index | Dive Gear Index | Health/Safety Index | Environment & Misc. Index | Seasonal Planner | Forums | Blogs | Free Articles | Book Picks | News |
| Dive Resort & Liveaboard Reviews | Featured Reports | Recent Issues | Back Issues | Login | Join | Special Offers | FAQ | About Us | Contact Us | Links |


Copyright © 1996-2012 Undercurrent (www.undercurrent.org)
3020 Bridgeway, Ste 102, Sausalito, Ca 94965
All rights reserved.

fc