Undercurrent, the scuba diving magazine for serious divers reviews dive resorts and scuba diving equipment "Best of the Web ... scuba tips no other source dares to publish" — Forbes  
Authoritative   •   Independent   •   Nonprofit  
Public Area Online Members' Area Print Subscribers' Area
Home Travel Dive Gear Health & Safety Environment & Misc. Free Dive Articles Seasonal Planner Blogs Forums Books News
Reader Reports Recent Issues Back Issues Featured Reports Special Offers Search Join Login FAQ About Us Contact Links
April 2005 Vol. 20, No. 4     RSS Feed for Undercurrent Issues
What's this?

Court Upholds Fish Feeding Ban

from the April, 2005 issue of Undercurrent   Subscribe Now

As Undercurrent has reported previously, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) banned the practice of salt water fish feeding by commercial operators back in 2001. The dispute began over the issue of shark feeding and quickly polarized the dive community. Local dive operators enlisted the support of organizations such as PADI, DEMA (the Diving Equipment and Marketing Association), and some diving publications to campaign against the ban while various environmental and spearfishing groups — with considerable less financial clout — supported it. Obviously, local dive operators saw feeding as a major draw to divers and thus had a strong economic incentive to maintain the status quo. The dispute also attracted attention because it would set a precedent for a practice that has become a major industry worldwide.

When their lobbying efforts failed, DEMA, along with several dive operators and other interested parties, sued to overturn the regulation, challenging its constitutionality on the grounds that it was “without basis, factually, scientifically and logically,” and that it discriminates against dive operators, divers and snorkelers.

Eventually, a Florida circuit court dismissed the suit, finding that the FFWCC had provided a “rational basis for the rule.” A key factor in the court’s decision was an affidavit filed by William Alevizon, who has written frequently for Undercurrent on conservation issues.

DEMA, et al., appealed the decision to Florida’s 1st District Court, which upheld the lower court’s ruling in January.

According to Henry Cabbage, Media Relations Director of the FFWCC, this decision makes any further appeals “highly difficult.” Cabbage said that his organization “had reason to believe that feeding excursions were affecting fish behavior,” because of anecdotal evidence of fish flocking to the sound of boats’ motors.” He noted: “The industry has an excellent safety record on these excursions, and we did not question that.” Since the Florida rule went into effect, similar fish-feeding bans have been enacted in Hawaii and the Cayman Islands.

Tom Ingram, DEMA’s executive director, told Undercurrent that his organization is considering its options in Florida and studying the Hawaii and Cayman regulations. “We rarely put these things to rest completely,” he noted.

I want to get all the stories! Tell me how I can become an Undercurrent Online Member and get online access to all the articles of Undercurrent as well as thousands of first hand reports on dive operations world-wide



Find in
Advanced Search

Sign up to receive our free
Undercurrent Online Update email
with news for serious divers
            Unsubscribe
We will not sell, exchange, or give your email address to any third party
.

| Home | Online Members Area | Print Subscribers Area |
My Account
| Travel Index | Dive Gear Index | Health/Safety Index | Environment & Misc. Index | Seasonal Planner | Forums | Blogs | Free Articles | Book Picks | News |
| Dive Resort & Liveaboard Reviews | Featured Reports | Recent Issues | Back Issues | Login | Join | Special Offers | FAQ | About Us | Contact Us | Links |


Copyright © 1996-2012 Undercurrent (www.undercurrent.org)
3020 Bridgeway, Ste 102, Sausalito, Ca 94965
All rights reserved.

fc