Main Menu
Join Undercurrent on Facebook

The Private, Exclusive Guide for Serious Divers Since 1975 | |
For Divers since 1975
The Private, Exclusive Guide for Serious Divers Since 1975
Join Undercurrent on Facebook
"Best of the Web: scuba tips no other
source dares to publish" -- Forbes
April 1998 Vol. 13, No. 4   RSS Feed for Undercurrent Issues
What's this?

Undercurrent the Ombudsman

Big deposit, no return, but can I use it next year?

from the April, 1998 issue of Undercurrent   Subscribe Now

When you put down a nonrefundable deposit on a trip and dont go, you usually expect to lose it. But what happens if you just want to go later?

Undercurrent subscriber John Cohen (Evanston IL) and his wife and another couple put down $2000 in April, 1996, with the travel agency Landfall Productions for a March, 1998, trip to the Galapagos aboard the Lammer Law. In December, when it looked like El Nino might foul both the weather and the diving, Cohen asked Landfall to change their reservations to March, 1999. Cohen told us that we knew it was beyond the sixty-day time limit they had set for cancellation, but we asked them to apply the deposit to a trip a year later. After discussions with both Landfall Productions and Duncan Muirhead, owner of the Lammer Law, Cohen was told that they must either go on the trip or forfeit their deposit. Cohen still plans to go to the Galapagos in 1999, but it now appears we will be on a competing vessel.

While Undercurrent understands why a no-refund policy exists trying to fill spots on a Galapagos trip three months before departure would be tough indeed we wondered whether a little mediation on our part might help. We called Dennis Zabo of Landfall Productions, who told us that Dr. Cohens attempt to change his trip was made well after the stipulated sixty-day notice period spelled out in all of our literature. Muirhead said Dr. Cohen decided to cancel just three months from the start of the trip 21 months from the date of his reservation. A trip to the Galapagos is not a spur of the moment decision to most people, so filling spaces in a three-month period is difficult.

Landfall and the Lammer Law have persuasive arguments, and theyre well within their rights. Although they could get full payment from the Cohen party the following year, they decided to stick with their business decision and policy. And the Cohen party, though out $500 per person, will probably be able to duck El Nino which may also prove to be a good business decision.

But theyd better not wait too long. Fishing is taking such a toll that Galapagos Island residents, authorities, tourist operators, and environmentalists declared March 4 a day of mourning for the archipelago, saying it is jeopardized by large-scale fishing activity. To recognize what they dubbed a Black Monday for the environment, participants dressed in black and marched through the streets of San Cristobal and Santa Isabel, and flags over public buildings were flown at half-mast.

I want to get all the stories! Tell me how I can become an Undercurrent Online Member and get online access to all the articles of Undercurrent as well as thousands of first hand reports on dive operations world-wide



NEW! Find in  

| Home | Online Members Area | My Account |
| Travel Index | Dive Gear Index | Health/Safety Index | Environment & Misc. Index | Seasonal Planner | Forums | Blogs | Free Articles | Book Picks | News |
| Dive Resort & Liveaboard Reviews | Featured Reports | Recent Issues | Back Issues | Login | Join | Special Offers | RSS | FAQ | About Us | Contact Us | Links |


Copyright © 1996-2016 Undercurrent (www.undercurrent.org)
3020 Bridgeway, Ste 102, Sausalito, Ca 94965
All rights reserved.

fc