Undercurrent Home
Home  |  Members' Home
Get notified of the latest reader reports
What's this?

Dive Review of
Nai'a in
Kiribati (Christmas Island)/Phoenix Islands

in 2005/05
an Instant Reader Report
by
Wendy McIlroy, PA, USA
Report Number 1718

Questions?
Send an email to the author of this report

Subscribe Now
What others have to say about Undercurrent
And get immediate access to ALL 6 dive reviews of Kiribati (Christmas Island)
and all other dive destinations immediately!

N/A means "Not Applicable" or "No Answer" given

Reporter
Dive Experience
Over 1000 dives
Where else diving
 Carribbean, Fiji, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Tonga 

Dive Conditions

Weather
sunny  
Seas
calm  
Water Temp
84   to 86    ° Fahrenheit  
Wetsuit Thickness
3
Water Visibility
50   to 100    Feet  
 
Dive Policy
Dive own profile
yes  
 
Enforced diving restrictions  
[Unspecified]  
Liveaboard?
yes 
Nitrox Available?
N/A 
What I saw
Sharks
Lots 
Mantas
1 or 2 
Dolphins
Schools 
Whale Sharks
None 
Turtles
> 2 
Whales
None 
Ratings 1 (worst)- 5 (best):
Corals
  1 stars
Tropical Fish
3 stars  
Small Critters
  2 stars
Large Fish
4 stars  
Large Pelagics
  4 stars
 
 
Underwater Photography  1 (worst)- 5 (best):
Subject Matter
3 stars  
Boat Facilities
5 stars
Overall rating for UWP's  
5 stars  
Shore Facilities  
N/A  
Comments
[None]  
Ratings and Overall Comments  1 (worst)- 5 (best):
Accommodations
5 stars
Food
4 stars
Service and Attitude
5 stars
Environmental Sensitivity  
N/A
Dive Operation
5 stars  
Shore Diving  
3 stars  
Snorkeling
N/A  
 
 

Overall Rating

Value for $$
N/A    
Beginners
3 stars   
Advanced
3 stars    
Comments  
I spent 2 weeks as part of an expedition to study the Phoenix Islands
ecosystem’s recovery from a severe coral bleaching episode in 2002. David
Obura and Sangeeta Mangubhai, our coral scientists, had been on 2 previous
Phoenix Islands expeditions, when the object was to study pristine reefs in
an area isolated from most human development. Many of you may have seen the
National Geographic article from February 2003, documenting the second of
these trips, in early 2002. Our current trip was meant to be a pleasure
trip to see these untouched reefs. Unfortunately, a severe hotspot of ocean
warming occurred here in late 2002, and a somber report of dead coral was
put out in November. Five people cancelled their plans for the trip, but
the rest of us decided to stay on but change the focus to research,
inviting the scientists who had been there previously to come along and see
if they could determine the severity of damage and potential for recovery.

It was indeed a severe bleaching episode--the temperature gauges set
during the 2002 trip and recovered during this one indicate that the ocean
heated up to well over the bleaching “baseline” of 30c for 5 months—all the
way up to 31.5c for a significant amount of time. The result is
staggering—in many places the coral is not only dead but reduced to rubble.
The “Coral Castle” site in Kanton lagoon, shown in its former glory in the
NG article, is intact but nearly 100% dead. Huge stacks of table coral in a
sea of staghorn coral, all dead. It must have been an amazing sight prior
to its demise. Watching the fish swimming there is analogous to watching
children playing in a junkyard or a war-ravaged city. It is heartening to
see the spirit of the children, but incredibly sad knowing that their
future is in serious doubt. This is the general feeling I got on this
expedition—that this is but one of the many ecosystems being lost to ocean
warming. There were areas on some of the smaller islands especially where
some recovery is occurring. Is the new growth just a last gasp before the
next wave of heat? Or will these living corals be able to withstand higher
temperatures? It will take years to know the answer to this. A particularly
interesting reason for studying this area is its remoteness. Recovery from
bleaching episodes in other areas of the world is generally aided by
“reseeding” of coral polyps from nearby undamaged reefs. In islands this
remote, can this reseeding occur? 
Right now there is still a fairly healthy fish population, although in the
past there were huge numbers of butterfly fish—literally hundreds flocking
over the reefs. Now we only see a few per dive. Previously there had also
been a lot of mantas. Total for the whole trip: 2. So the fish population
is already changing. What are the long-term ramifications of all this?
There are a lot of questions, and few answers. 
There are other concerns as well. In 2000 there was a very healthy shark
population around the islands. Between that visit and the 2002 expedition,
long-liners came through, with the blessing of the Kiribati government,
fishing for shark fins for the Asian market. The shark population has not
recovered from this.  Formerly “sharky” sites are fairly barren of sharks.
On Nikumaroro (Gardner) Island, the last island we visited and the most
remote, it was clear that the shark-finners had not been through, and it
was heartening and exhilarating to see healthy populations of gray reef,
black tip and white tip sharks, from curious juveniles to fully grown
adults. Our best dives were definitely on Nikumaroro.
There were a few land visits as well. One highlight was our very first
island, Phoenix Island, where there is an enormous population of boobies
and frigate birds—a real bird-watcher’s paradise. 
On a positive side, we had a terrific group of people and, as always, the
Nai’a crew made us all feel like family. This was my 4th trip on Nai'a, and
I have been delighted with every one. I don't think there's a better crew
and a happier boat anywhere. We all enjoyed the fish and shark encounters,
focusing on the positive. The sharks at Nikumaroro and the large number of
Napolean Wrasse at all of the islands were worth seeing. We had interesting
discussions about what we were seeing and what we thought it meant. We know
that our participation in this trip was important, and that our main
purpose in coming was to bear witness to what’s happening. This letter is
my attempt to do so, and I don't regret going on the trip.
 

Other reviews for only this dive operator (Nai'a)

Questions?
Send an email to the author of this report

Subscribe Now
What others have to say about Undercurrent
And get immediate access to ALL 6 dive reviews of Kiribati (Christmas Island)
and all other dive destinations immediately!

Other Kiribati (Christmas Island) Dive Reviews and Reports

Diving Guide to Kiribati (Christmas Island)

Diving Reviews for All Dive Destinations

Want to see a bunch of Kiribati (Christmas Island) reports in one place?
Use the Mini Chapbook Facility to create a collection
of reader reports you want all in one place for easy reading/printing/...
Select the years and dive operators you want and it's done in a snap.
NEW! The 734-page 2012 Travelin' Diver's Chapbook is available to subscribers now.
It contains all our reader reports on ALL destinations filed between Dec, 2010 thru Nov, 2011.

Undercurrent Online Members also have online access to the current and back issues as well as the current and past Chapbooks. If not already an Online Member you can join now.

Note: The information here was reported by the author above, but has NOT been reviewed by Undercurrent prior to posting on our website. It is presented here to provide Undercurrent readers with timely information on dive operations worldwide. The material may contain errors, typos, ... Please report any major problems by writing to us and referencing the report number above.

Undercurrent Home


Sign up to receive our free
Undercurrent Online Update email
with news for serious divers
            Unsubscribe
We will not sell, exchange, or give your email address to any third party
.


Copyright © 1996-2012 Undercurrent (www.undercurrent.org)
3020 Bridgeway, Ste 102, Sausalito, Ca 94965
All rights reserved.